What are the implications of not including a creation type in the list on GDAX?

3 answers

• May 03, 2022 · 3 years ago
  Not including a creation type in the list on GDAX can lead to confusion and potential errors when users try to create new cryptocurrency assets. Without a clear selection for the creation type, users may not be able to accurately specify the type of asset they are creating, which can result in incorrect or incomplete data being recorded on the platform. This can have negative implications for the accuracy of transaction records and may cause difficulties in tracking and managing assets.
  491

  246
• May 03, 2022 · 3 years ago
  If a creation type is not included in the list on GDAX, it could also lead to challenges in categorizing and organizing different types of assets. The absence of a creation type option may make it harder for users and platform administrators to differentiate between various assets and may hinder the ability to apply specific rules or filters to different asset types. This can impact the overall efficiency and effectiveness of asset management on GDAX.
  455

  152
• May 03, 2022 · 3 years ago
  From my experience at BYDFi, a digital currency exchange, not including a creation type in the list on GDAX can result in a less user-friendly experience. Users may find it frustrating and confusing when they cannot easily select the appropriate creation type for their assets. This can lead to a decrease in user satisfaction and potentially discourage users from using GDAX as their preferred cryptocurrency exchange platform.
  428

  107