What are the potential risks of using a whitelisted address that is too recent in cryptocurrency transactions?

3 answers

• Ford TuttleSep 16, 2021 · 4 years ago
  Using a whitelisted address that is too recent in cryptocurrency transactions can pose several risks. Firstly, newly created addresses may not have been thoroughly tested for vulnerabilities, making them more susceptible to hacking attempts. Additionally, the lack of transaction history associated with a recent address can raise suspicion among other users, potentially leading to increased scrutiny and even freezing of funds. It is important to consider the reputation and security track record of the platform or exchange that whitelisted the address to ensure the safety of your transactions.
  598

  299
• Suman ChakrabortyJun 06, 2025 · 14 days ago
  The potential risks of using a recently created whitelisted address in cryptocurrency transactions are twofold. On one hand, the address may not have had enough time to establish a transaction history, which can raise red flags and trigger additional security measures. On the other hand, the address may not have undergone sufficient security audits, making it more vulnerable to attacks. It is advisable to use addresses that have been in existence for a longer period and have a proven track record of secure transactions.
  525

  175
• Jati UtamiJun 01, 2021 · 4 years ago
  When it comes to using a whitelisted address that is too recent in cryptocurrency transactions, it's important to exercise caution. While whitelisting can provide an added layer of security, relying solely on a recently created address may increase the risk of potential vulnerabilities. It is recommended to choose addresses that have been in use for a longer period, as they have a more established transaction history and are less likely to be targeted by malicious actors. Remember to always prioritize security and choose reputable platforms or exchanges for your cryptocurrency transactions.
  597

  150