What legal arguments is Ripple making in the XRP vs SEC lawsuit?

3 answers

• Hatim ErrattabJul 03, 2023 · 2 years ago
  Ripple is making several legal arguments in the XRP vs SEC lawsuit. One of the main arguments is that XRP should not be classified as a security, but rather as a digital currency. Ripple claims that XRP has a different function and purpose compared to traditional securities, and therefore should not be subject to the same regulations. They argue that XRP is used as a medium of exchange and a bridge currency for cross-border transactions, and its value is not dependent on the success of Ripple as a company. Additionally, Ripple argues that the SEC failed to provide fair notice to market participants regarding the classification of XRP as a security, which they believe is a violation of due process.
  706

  353
• PajelllSep 26, 2021 · 4 years ago
  In the XRP vs SEC lawsuit, Ripple is arguing that XRP is not a security but a digital asset. They claim that XRP has a clear utility and is used as a medium of exchange and a bridge currency for international transactions. Ripple argues that the SEC's classification of XRP as a security is based on an outdated understanding of cryptocurrencies and fails to consider the unique characteristics of XRP. They also point out that the SEC has not taken consistent enforcement actions against other cryptocurrencies with similar characteristics to XRP, which they believe is evidence of selective enforcement.
  605

  202
• liuhyJul 15, 2020 · 5 years ago
  As a third-party observer, it is interesting to note that Ripple is making the argument that XRP is not a security but a digital currency in the XRP vs SEC lawsuit. They claim that XRP has a distinct function and purpose compared to traditional securities, and its value is not tied to the success of Ripple as a company. Ripple argues that XRP is primarily used for cross-border transactions and as a bridge currency, and therefore should not be subject to the same regulations as securities. They also question the SEC's lack of clarity and consistency in its approach to classifying cryptocurrencies.
  603

  151