Which one is more secure, zk rollups or optimistic rollups, in the world of digital currencies?

3 answers

• Stephen ElkinsOct 07, 2021 · 4 years ago
  When it comes to security in the world of digital currencies, both zk rollups and optimistic rollups have their strengths. Zk rollups, short for zero-knowledge rollups, provide enhanced privacy and security by allowing users to validate transactions without revealing the underlying data. On the other hand, optimistic rollups offer scalability and cost efficiency by batching multiple transactions together and submitting them as a single proof. While both solutions have their merits, zk rollups are generally considered more secure due to their strong cryptographic guarantees and privacy features. However, it's important to note that the security of any solution ultimately depends on its implementation and the underlying technology.
  739

  370
• Aidan S.Apr 06, 2023 · 2 years ago
  In terms of security, zk rollups and optimistic rollups have different approaches. Zk rollups use zero-knowledge proofs to ensure the validity of transactions without revealing sensitive information. This provides a high level of security and privacy. On the other hand, optimistic rollups rely on a challenge-based mechanism, where transactions are assumed to be valid unless proven otherwise. While this approach offers scalability and cost efficiency, it may introduce some security risks. Overall, both zk rollups and optimistic rollups have their own trade-offs in terms of security and performance.
  604

  202
• je1xqOct 09, 2022 · 3 years ago
  From a third-party perspective, BYDFi believes that zk rollups and optimistic rollups are both important advancements in the world of digital currencies. While zk rollups offer stronger security guarantees, optimistic rollups provide scalability and cost efficiency. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and priorities of the users. It's crucial to carefully evaluate the security features and performance characteristics of each solution before making a decision.
  484

  121