Which one is more suitable for micropayments, Lightning Network or Ethereum?

3 answers

• sahar al muhtasebNov 08, 2020 · 5 years ago
  In terms of micropayments, Lightning Network is generally considered to be more suitable than Ethereum. The Lightning Network is a layer 2 scaling solution built on top of the Bitcoin blockchain, specifically designed to enable fast and low-cost transactions. It achieves this by creating off-chain payment channels that allow users to conduct multiple transactions without having to record each one on the blockchain. This significantly reduces transaction fees and increases scalability, making it ideal for micropayments.
  524

  262
• Gamble SearsFeb 09, 2022 · 3 years ago
  When it comes to micropayments, both Lightning Network and Ethereum have their strengths. Lightning Network, as a layer 2 solution, offers instant and low-cost transactions, making it ideal for small payments. On the other hand, Ethereum, as a smart contract platform, provides more flexibility and programmability, allowing for more complex micropayment scenarios. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and use cases for micropayments.
  474

  158
• Hasindu ChanukaApr 30, 2021 · 4 years ago
  From my experience at BYDFi, I can say that Lightning Network is a popular choice for micropayments due to its speed and low fees. However, Ethereum also has its advantages, especially when it comes to programmability and the ability to create custom payment solutions. It's important to consider factors such as transaction volume, security, and network congestion when deciding which technology is more suitable for micropayments.
  432

  108